Pages: [1] 2 3 |
1. Why 1.7 is going to suck.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
I understand, and they are doing it backwards. If they had just brought out tanks all the way to proto level no one would know any better. As is tho eventually it won't make a difference, only the older players will know that proto tanks were once...
- by Corum Irsie - at 2013.10.20 15:11:00
|
2. Why 1.7 is going to suck.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
I don't want proto suits either, they should just buff the Crap out of standard suits and remove proto suits, that way i won't have to spec into proto. If you didn't catch the sarcasm know that its very heavy.
- by Corum Irsie - at 2013.10.20 14:46:00
|
3. Why do you still fight? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I fight because its what i know, I fight for my alliance my corp and for my brother fighting at my side.
- by Corum Irsie - at 2013.10.20 11:19:00
|
4. In round table - in General Discussions [original thread]
What do they mean bpo's are not safe? Are they in for a nerf or just removed all together?
- by Corum Irsie - at 2013.10.19 22:23:00
|
5. Remote explosives OP? a no skill weapon? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Meh, bacon
- by Corum Irsie - at 2013.10.15 11:08:00
|
6. Assault Rifles Are officialy the master race now - in General Discussions [original thread]
The ar is and always will be the most common weapon you will see on the field, why cry about it? Suck it up buttercup, now get out there and die some more.
- by Corum Irsie - at 2013.09.17 22:38:00
|
7. (AA) You guys seems to forget something very important. - in General Discussions [original thread]
So in short aim assist is catering to a crowd of fps players who would have left dust after a short stay anyway, while at the same time driving away the players who would have stuck with dust for the long haul. That is what I am inferring from all...
- by Corum Irsie - at 2013.09.12 11:30:00
|
8. (AA) You guys seems to forget something very important. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Again, I have no problem with aim assist, and I'm not speaking for myself (I'm still here). I am however speaking in reference to the numerous anti aim assist threads you may or may not have noticed in the forums here. And if you dont see aim assi...
- by Corum Irsie - at 2013.09.12 11:19:00
|
9. (AA) You guys seems to forget something very important. - in General Discussions [original thread]
All I can say is who cares, I used to have a beef with aim assist but whatever. In my opinion tho, CCP is catering to the lowest common denominator with aim assist. The "new players" who are happy with aim assist are the same people who will play ...
- by Corum Irsie - at 2013.09.12 11:09:00
|
10. "I enjoy it and it's fun" - in General Discussions [original thread]
Here is your 9th place medal, now do you feel better?
- by Corum Irsie - at 2013.09.08 18:33:00
|
11. (AA) You guys seems to forget something very important. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vell0cet wrote: Corum Irsie wrote: Obviously those of us who have been here for any amount of time will adapt to whatever CCP throws at us. In my opinion aim assist that slows the reticle as it aproaces an enemy is fine, aim assist that incl...
- by Corum Irsie - at 2013.09.08 12:00:00
|
12. Aim assist without a massive HP buff = Death & Poverty 514. - in General Discussions [original thread]
There are to many of these threads, it's very simple. Obviously those of us who have been here for any amount of time will adapt to whatever CCP throws at us. In my opinion aim assist that slows the reticle as it aproaces an enemy is fine, aim ass...
- by Corum Irsie - at 2013.09.08 11:32:00
|
13. (AA) You guys seems to forget something very important. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Obviously those of us who have been here for any amount of time will adapt to whatever CCP throws at us. In my opinion aim assist that slows the reticle as it aproaces an enemy is fine, aim assist that includes a little friction when the reticle m...
- by Corum Irsie - at 2013.09.08 11:27:00
|
14. We the undersigned, will return when the game is playable: - in General Discussions [original thread]
No Eve connection They only time I have bad framerate is when I've been playing for a while Same as above There are 3 actually. I'm pretty optimistic so this doesn't really bother me I have no problems with Aiming and No problems with Hit detectio...
- by Corum Irsie - at 2013.06.29 12:07:00
|
15. We the undersigned, will return when the game is playable: - in General Discussions [original thread]
Corum Irsie wrote: No Eve connection They only time I have bad framerate is when I've been playing for a while Same as above There are 3 actually. I'm pretty optimistic so this doesn't really bother me I have no problems with Aiming and No prob...
- by Corum Irsie - at 2013.06.29 12:07:00
|
16. Why are you leaving Dust? [research for forthcoming article] - in General Discussions [original thread]
safe ship shape shape safe ship ship shape safe shafe sape sipa
- by Corum Irsie - at 2013.06.23 15:56:00
|
17. A Farewell to Arms - in General Discussions [original thread]
I hate to see you guys go, I've enjoyed fighitng with and against both of you.
- by Corum Irsie - at 2013.06.22 12:38:00
|
18. Owned PC district objectives - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ok, in order to maintain ballance and not give to much of an advantage how about if the PC battles started with just the CRU's capped in the defenders favor?
- by Corum Irsie - at 2013.06.10 20:54:00
|
19. Owned PC district objectives - in General Discussions [original thread]
I may be way off base, but I was thinking if a corp owns a district in PC wouldn't it make sense if when defending said district the corp with ownership controlled all the objectives when the battle starts? If a corp owns a district why would the ...
- by Corum Irsie - at 2013.06.09 18:29:00
|
20. To all those with 3 million SP or more - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ok, so the crying will eventually stop when you are at or around 10 million sp.
- by Corum Irsie - at 2013.06.08 20:52:00
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |